Showing posts with label St. Patrick's Day. Show all posts
Showing posts with label St. Patrick's Day. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Happy Evacuation Day

I know. This day, March 17th is celebrated the world around as St. Patrick’s Day.

The world around.

Like the world famous St. Patrick’s Day parade in Singapore.

Mainly, it’s a chance to drink lots of beer in honor of some guy who lived in the 5th century and converted lots of Picts to the local version of Christianity.

And allegedly got rid of all the snakes in Ireland.

I am told, however, that this was taken care of a few millennia before, by huge thick ice sheets that also converted Irish soil to “rocks and.” As in “rocks and clay” or “rocks and sand” or “rocks and rocks.”

But I like to remember this day the way the folks in Suffolk County, Massachusetts remember it: Evacuation Day.

On March 17th, 1776, the British army under Sir William Howe, which had laid siege to the city of Boston for eleven months, had to beat a retreat to the sea. This was the only option left to Howe when he saw that Washington’s army brought cannon captured at Fort Ticonderoga up to Dorchester Heights, effectively rendering Howe’s army’s security completely compromised.

I am also told that the watch word that was used by Washington’s troops on that day was “St. Patrick.”

Saturday, March 17, 2007

On St. Patrick’s Day My Thoughts Turn to the Ending of a War

I wondered about the pull that British voters have over their government in a previous posting. They have something in their laws that we don’t have: a “No Confidence” vote. A similar “No Confidence” vote was cast in Austin this past week by the Joint Select Committee investigating the abuses at Texas Youth Commission sites. It didn’t appear to have any effect until they all resigned en masse yesterday.

58% of Americans want the US out of Iraq. But I wonder, would we get these 58% to cast a vote of no confidence? I wonder how many would see this as a vote in support of the troops as opposed to a withdrawal of support. That seems to be the logic and reasoning of some of the conservative Democrats in Washington DC.

I am thinking about this today because today, on St. Patrick’s day, I just realized another reason that the British declared victory and got out of Iraq when they did. They are just fresh off of a little civil war that they had on their hands in Northern Ireland. That little war, euphemistically called “The Troubles” lasted, some say, for 37 years.

No wonder they wanted out when they did. What with Bush saying that this war will be won by the next president.

There are similarities between the civil war in Northern Ireland and the one in Iraq. Just as the Iraq civil was is a war between Sunni and Shia factions of the Muslim religion, the war in Northern Ireland was primarily a war between two factions of the Christian religion, Protestants and Catholics. It was also a class war with rich and powerful Protestants oppressing poor Catholics, just as Sunni were the rich ones in power during Sadam’s reign, and Shia were the oppressed. One difference is that while the Sunnis, a minority in Iraq, were the powerful oppressors, it was the Protestant majority that was the oppressors in Northern Ireland.

They were able to keep their little war going for 37 years, and there was nothing that the British occupation forces could do to stop it.

OK, so if there are so many similarities between these two civil wars, how did they finally end “The Troubles”? The reports that I read all point to one thing: everyone got tired of having a war so they just stopped. People started thinking that they could solve their differences constitutionally.

That’s what it’s going to take in Iraq, I think.

But I don’t think American soldiers need to be in there in the crossfire for another 33 years waiting for Sunnis, Shia and Kurds to get tired of whacking each other.