If they don’t act, Leininger says, the 2,000 students that attend a private school under his personally bankrolled school voucher program will be "out on the street".
Man, that’s a little cold.
And a little wrong.
First, I assume that these students who have been, up to now, the beneficiaries of a private school education will have no trouble getting themselves enrolled in a publicly funded school system. Unlike private schools, public schools cannot boot kids out into the streets (although, speaking as a public school educator, you sometimes wish . . . ). Public schools are, by law, obligated to admit anyone under the age of 19.5 years and give them an education.
Here is what Kathy Miller of the anti-voucher Texas Freedom Network said about Leininger’s plans:
"Private schools may be willing to put those kids out on the street, but the great thing about our neighborhood public schools is that they would never do that."
Not only wouldn’t but couldn’t.
Texas Education Code Title 1 Chapter 1§ 1.002:
Texas Education Code Title 1 Chapter 1§ 1.002:
EQUAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES OR OPPORTUNITIES. (a) An educational institution undertaking to provide education, services, or activities to any individual within the jurisdiction or geographical boundaries of the educational institution shall provide equal opportunities to all individuals within its jurisdiction or geographical boundaries pursuant to this code.
Leininger’s private schools don’t have that rule to live by. How nice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/090e1/090e134971c2e193233f88640b4c84263eed9cb5" alt=""
And another reason to rethink school vouchers? No one wants them.
2 comments:
When Leineiger's students are tossed back into public schools what does that do to the public schools but cost them more and overcrowd them. I'm sure the parents of the other children will appreciate that.
Great work.
Post a Comment