Judge John Dietz has – again - ruled that the way that the state funds its
public education system is unconstitutional, and doubly so.
This is round two for Judge Dietz who is no novice when it
comes to inadequate school funding. In 2004 he ruled in a case brought by 300
school districts that the state’s education funding system was unconstitutional
and inefficient, and ordered the state to halt school spending in October 2005
if problems aren't fixed.
The state legislature responded by cuts local school
property taxes by one-third while allocating more state funding. To prevent
revenue loss, they placed minimum funding requirements on districts based on a “temporary
freeze” in the amount of money districts spent per student that year. The
temporary freeze was never lifted, however. In addition the Legislature capped tax
rates at $1.17 per $100 of property valuation and allowed each district to choose
how much to levy in taxes.
Then the legislature, in 2011, slashed the funds that the
state provided by $5.6 billion while at the same time passing new standardized
testing standards that raised the bar on what every public school student must
do in order to graduate.
To this, Judge Dietz had some choice words in today’s ruling:
“There is no free lunch. We either want increased standards
and are willing to pay the price, or we don't.”
In today’s ruling, Judge Dietz ruled the funding system
unconstitutional on two fronts: it does not provide adequate funding for “general
diffusion of knowledge” as required in the state’s constitution, and that the
funding system was a de facto income
tax, which is forbidden by the constitution.
A written ruling will be issued within a month, but nothing
is going to happen on this one until the all-Republican state supreme court
gets a chance to rule, and that won’t happen during this legislative session.
Because as you know, there’s no hurry. When it comes to
raising revenue for public school education in Texas there is never a need to
hurry.
No comments:
Post a Comment