Well if no one else will say it, I will say it. Were it not for a singular military policy of President Obama, the news today that Muammar Gaddhafi’s life has finally ended would have never seen the light of day. As a matter of fact, the news today could have been about the hundreds or thousands of Libyan rebels being executed as punishment for being on the wrong side of a revolution when the world allowed the mad dictator of
to wage war on his own people. Libya
and its allies stepped in to provide material support and air cover for the Libyan rebels, Gaddhafi’s army was set to invade rebellious US , level it, and murder its citizens. That didn’t happen. Benghazi
And where were the Republicans on this? As usual, either ignoring it completely or casting disparaging remarks on Obama’s policy, a policy that worked. A policy that worked without the loss of a single American life.
Senator Richard Lugar is famous for his immediate poor opinion of
involvement in the Libyan revolution. In March, when the conflict broke out, he is famously known for saying this. From CNN: US
“I do not understand the mission because as far as I can tell in the
there is no mission and there are no guidelines for success.” United States
To which we can now say, nothing succeeds like success.
Then there was The Newt on Meet the Press:
“I think that now the -- let me draw a distinction. I would not have intervened. I think there were a lot of other ways to affect Qadhafi. I think there are a lot of allies in the region that we could have worked with. I would not have used American and European forces.”
Let me finish for him: “I would have allowed thousands of
citizens to die at the hands of a government that is supposed to protect them.” Benghazi
Truth is, this has been a policy that worked a whole lot better than the removal of the Iraqi government.
And now I am listening for the plaudits and praise from Republicans over yet another
Middle East success story. And what am I hearing?