Gee, what a surprise.
This from a guy whose opinion of what the constitutional residency requirement of a US Congressman was challenged and debunked in the case of Texas Democratic Party vs. Tina Benkiser et al.
And he was even dumb enough to bring that whole affair back to the light of day when he was interviewed yesterday by Chris Matthews on his MSNBC news program Hardball.
The question of whether the 2008 Republican candidate was a natural born citizen was settled when it was ruled that John McCain, who was born in the
What has never been settled, because it is now a moot point, is whether George W. Romney, who nearly pulled off getting the Republican nomination in 1968 was a natural born
Because George Romney was born in
The father of Mitt, former
That he was born to American parents, I am thinking, was the explanation that was provided. A child born to US citizens in any foreign country automatically has
So now I have to ask, why do Republicans take such umbrage over this issue? They do not deny that Obama’s mother was a
Even if Obama was born in
So all of these arguments are for naught. If George Romney qualified as a
So why do Republicans (and now Tom DeLay) keep up the noise over this issue? I suppose it is for the same reason that male dogs lick their scrotums.
Because they can.
And because they are running dog racists.