This week, we learned that Senate candidate Ted Cruz has
gotten the nod to speak at the GOP national convention this year, with a tip of
the hat toward not only the TEA Party but Hispanic voters. And we have also
learned that TEA Partiers have begun a whisper campaign that Cruz could just
possibly be their standard bearer in 2016 since Mitt Romney is arguably the
weakest GOP presidential candidate since Bob Dole.
Then someone checked, and oops, Cruz was born in Canada.
Canada, as well as Kenya, both qualify as foreign soil.
But wait, there’s more. Not only was Ted Cruz born in
Canada, his father was a former Cuban Freedom Fighter for Fidel Castro. A Cuban
and a Communist.
Hmmm. Not only a foreigner, but the son of a Communist
Castroite.
Seems unlikely then.
Oh, but wait. Guess what? According to the research, Ted
Cruz’ mother was born in Delaware and therefore qualifies as a US citizen.
And that, friends and neighbors, makes Ted Cruz eligible as
a “natural born” US citizen because his mother was a citizen, and besides that,
Cruz was never naturalized – a key point in deciding if one is a “natural born”
citizen,
So the TEA Party heaved a collective sigh of relief and went
back to their whisper campaign.
And there you have it: a complete double standard.
Give it all to the Birthers. Give it to them that Barack
Hussein Obama was born in Kenya. Or Indonesia. Give it to them that he was
adopted by his mother’s second husband and his real name is Barry Soetoro. Give
it to them that his father and step father were Muslims, and neither of them
citizens of the United States. Give it all to them.
Give all that up and it still remains that Barack Obama’s
mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was born in Kansas. His mother, born in Kansas, was
a full citizen of the United States.
Now Delaware may have been a state before Kansas was, but
last I looked both were states in the past century when both mothers were born.
So here’s the thing. How is it that TEA Partiers can undergo
such mental gymnastics to verify that their favorite son is a natural born
citizen of the United States, but the same set of conclusions cannot be
applicable to the sitting president? How
is that?
Is it that an American is not an American when the TEA Party
decides? Or is it just the case that when a black man is in this position it
becomes political fodder for those who want to whip up the historical racial
suspicions and prejudices that still haunt our nation?
Either way it goes is unsettling to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment